Audi Repair Shop Doylestown
Call 267 279 9477 to schedule a appointment
We learned all about the
last week, and now we’ve discovered
for its new 2.5-liter turbocharged engine. Unsurprisingly, it gets slightly worse fuel economy than its naturally aspirated counterpart. The 2019 turbo
in front-wheel drive form gets 23 mpg city and 28 mpg on the highway. Opting for all-wheel drive brings those figures down by one each.
Front-wheel drive
CX-5s with the naturally aspirated 2.5 liter
net you 25 mpg city and 31 mpg highway — all-wheel drive drops one mpg in both categories, just like the turbocharged engine.
For a little comparison, the turbocharged engine makes 250 horsepower and 310 pound-feet of torque on 93 octane gasoline, while the non-boosted engine makes 187 horsepower and 186 pound-feet of torque. You’re definitely taking a hit in fuel economy, but the gain in power might be worth it, since the decrease isn’t that terrible.
Cars in its price and power range with all-wheel drive have comparable fuel economy. The
with the 2.0-liter turbo is rated at 20/27;
with the 2.0-liter turbo is 22/28 and the
gets 21/29. There isn’t really a clear winner in fuel economy for this much power when you look around the segment, but
engine is half a liter larger than everyone else. This translates to better torque than most of its competitors, but Mazda manages similar fuel economy.
Also similar to many of these decked-out compact crossovers is the new high price of the Mazda we wrote about before. You won’t be getting in to the turbocharged
for any less than $35,865, and that’s before adding all-wheel drive. If you wanted a bigger Mazda like the
, its fuel economy figures aren’t significantly worse than the CX-5. Front-wheel drive versions are rated 22/28, and it drops two mpg in each category for all-wheel drive. The updated 2019 CX-5 should be coming to
soon.
Related video:
from Autoblog https://ift.tt/2qWPJsm